AMD vs Intel Ivy Bridge Trinity, Where It Fast

Nuances of competition in the realm of portable computer or laptop getting viscous after AMD released a mobile processor series A-10 is known by the code name "Trinity".
Several sites have been comparing processor technology for thin laptop AMD "Ultrathin" is a kind offer from Intel, popularly as "Ivy Bridge", which is used in a thin laptop "Ultrabook".

As reported by PCWorld, the comparison of the two processors for thin laptop that is quite diverse.
In terms of overall performance, it seems Trinity has not been able to match the Ivy Bridge. As can be seen from the graph below, taken from the site Anandtech.com, flagship AMD is lagging quite far, even when compared to Intel's previous champ, "Sandy Bridge".
In the graph, it appears Ivy Bridge (Core i7-3720QM on Asus laptop N56VM) memduduki top positions. However, Trinity is still much faster than its predecessor, the AMD processor series A-8 is known as the "Llano".
amd_test2
Trinity shines when used to play games. In this case, GPU Radeon HD 7000 series embedded in it managed to beat Intel HD 4000 graphics processors at Ivy Bridge so that the Trinity is able to run games more smoothly.
amd_test
Trinity as a whole about 20 percent faster than the Ivy Bridge when used to play games, based on testing against 15 title game over.
About battery life, according to Anandtech site, Trinity (A-10 4600M, Quad Core) can last for almost 7 hours when worn surfing the internet.
This figure is quite good and better than its predecessor, Llano, who scored 6 hours, as well as Ivy Bridge (Core i7-3720QM, Quad Core), which posted 5 hours.
So, which one is better? Depending on needs. For those who want maximum performance, thin laptop with an Intel Corei7 (Ivy Bridge) is unmatched.
However, for fans of the game or those who require high battery life, thin laptop with AMD processor series A-10 (Trinity) could be an attractive option.